Відео

what a lap

Che pigmeo!!!!

This test is not accurate, slog2 and 3 should be between +1.7 or +2 overexposed, this is why you are getting more noise in your slog footages, you are then brightening up in post which raise the noise floor of the signal. Actually slog3 or hlg3 are very close and give you more dynamics range and better highlights, also more room for color grading afterwards

Thanks a lot.

Ma sei scappato da sotto il letto di Berlusconi o stavi in Africa mo vuoi fare il politico chi ti ha pagato Berlusconi vai via ma ora Vuoi fare il politico come salvini povera Italia e Italiani

Bravo Renato!

For my eye, both profile have noise in this test, do you have any suggestion setting to reduce noise?

What’s a good gamma setting, if I’m not color grading? Thanks for your time!

Does the +1 etc represent exposure compensation when shot? Sorry i am new.

Awesome video and comparison Fabrizio, thank you very much. I recently upgraded my reliable a6000 to a used a6300 and am currently experimenting with slog2 and cine4. Your tests help me a lot. Cheers!

Ahahahhaha LOST

il video è stabilizzato in post produzione?

4k at 100p? What, how?

Thank you for the test!!

Very useful, thank you so much!!!

una mezza pugnetta....mezzo metro di pura MERDA!!!

ANCHE LEI.... ANCHE LEI..... ANCHE IO......ANCHE IO..... ANCHE LEI......

Why is Sony exposure automatic in movie ?

you will get always more noise in slog 2... this is a bad comparison

Cropped scene. Very distance a real anamorphic

Ciao complimenti per il tuo canale. Vorrei un tuo parere. Ho una Sony a6300. Sto provando sia S-log2 sgamut, Slog3 sgamut3, entrambi mi pare che diano una resa inferiore dei colori in post rispetto a Cine4. Ed inoltre il semplice settaggio Neutro, mi sembra ancora migliore sia in resa colore che in rumore quando li lavoro in post con Premiere Pro... Possibile?

0:39

Il fatto che sembra più nitido un "telegiornale" che una pellicola è dovuto al aggiunta voluta del add noise in quest ultima? Grazie😁

Una delle maggior differenze tra pellicola e riprese del tipo "telegiornale" tanto per capirci è la profondità di campo?

Grande!

At 1:57, you can clearly read out the "EDIFIER" brand on the speakers on the control shot without a profile. It's a complete blurry mess on all the other profiles though. I didn't think s-Log or CINE would remove detail?

nice job, quite helpfull

Almost no differences.

Brunetta distruggi fazio

It seems to me that the DRO level 5 one has pretty much the same dynamic range as slog2

Very detailed testing thanks for this

We have similar findings, for low light or night shots, I do find Cine4 to be cleaner than SLog2. My personal motto is that For a given light situation, if I cannot achieve a proper exposure to the right of 1 1/2 stop at base ISO of 800-1600, I dont use SLog2 or 3, I use regular gamma profiles such as Cine4 or Cine2.

Dat LOL 😂😂

exactly what i nee to know!! great job sir!

Very useful demo. Thanks for that.

thank you for such speechless but very clear cut explanation but i will oblidge if you answer me slog2 slog3 cine 4 you use belong to which profile i mean p1 p2 ....p9 all the best for your furture projects thank you

Thank you for the comparison

Ma di quanto aumenta la velocità di rendering col il SSD?

From what I understand, Cine gives you 10-12 stops of dr while slog gives 12-14. If that's true, then you are only gaining an additional two stops with slog. Of course, in a low-light situation, two stops could be significant, but in most, I don't think that compensates for all the additional issues you have with s-log, including the need to overexpose the footage, shoot at 3200 iso, mandatory grading in post, and the need for ND filters outside. For me, Cine 4 is the best way to go and it still gives you the latitude to do some modest grading in post.

Prompt please, I remove on sony 6300, installation s-log3 is very interesting. It's the settings, I have a problem in that even when shooting a daylight in black objects or shadows there are strong noises, denoiser does not take them out, and I've reviewed how many video tests I've taken on the 6300 in s-log3, there's no problem. A lot of video watched the tests, but little is said about tinctures and everything in English, with a language of complexity. Either that is not what I'm doing, or I'm already sinning on the camera. You can tell what settings you have on s-log3 or show. What is the reason for these noise?

This video is not available for me...

i so much miss my cinemal tool its so quick

So, question 2: What kind of spot metering are you using to arrive at your exposure number? Is it multi, center, or a center spot?

Interesting test. One question: when you say "color matched" there is a dramatic change in the appearance of the Log footage. What are you actually doing to "color match?"

Can you do a tutorial?

is that -1 +1 gamma?

Lut for the cine4?

Very nice test! Exactly what I was looking for. However, due to the low bit rate on UA-cam, the noise is not easy to compare. Could you maybe make a higher bitrate video available for download?

Brilliant tests, thank you.